Posted by on
Tags:
Categories: AMD Epyc Intel Qualcomm

Over the past six years, @Intel has adroitly retaken and defended its #datacenter business from all challengers. @AMD was never able to win significant share for its Bulldozer and Piledriver families, and while companies like Calxeda intended to challenge Intel in high-density servers, such battles never materialized. AMD’s Epyc servers may take market share from Intel over the longer term, but AMD has repeatedly said that it’s ramping Epyc slowly through the end of 2017. That just leaves Qualcomm, but that “just” may need to be in quotation marks. Early benchmarks on Qualcomm’s Centriq server CPUs (codenamed Falkor) by Cloudflare show the Qualcomm chips offering potent competition for Intel. The information in question comes from a blog post published by Cloudflare. I absolutely recommend giving it a read for the full details of what we’re going to discuss, but we’ll call out some salient results. First off, here’s how the three cores compare:

On paper, they’re pretty similar. Qualcomm’s expertise at building small cores clearly comes in handy on the TDP front, allowing it stack 46 cores in a package at a lower TDP than we’ve seen from Intel or AMD. The difference in nodes (Intel’s 14nm versus Qualcomm’s 10nm) shouldn’t really matter; the 10nm process node deployed at the pure-play foundries is believed to be a rough match for Intel’s own 10nm. Cloudflare puts the three chips head to head in a variety of benchmarks, including OpenSSL, compression tests, Golang (Go crypto, gzip, regexp, strings), LuaJIT, and NGINX.

Since we don’t want to pull all of Cloudflare’s results, we’ve settled on two tests that illustrate overall performance standings: Single-threaded tests (LuaJIT) and multi-threaded tests (gzip).

In LuaJIT, the Intel chips win single-threaded performance comparisons, hands down. This reflects Skylake and Broadwell’s overall single-thread performance in the benchmarks Cloudflare ran — the Intel chips are at their strongest here, thanks to higher innate single-threaded perf and higher target clocks. If you’re doing lightly threaded work, Intel may well be the decisive leader (though we’d ask why you’re buying a 10-12 core CPU in the first place).

In multi-threading workloads, the Qualcomm Cintriq often whacks Intel upside the head. This is, again, not particularly surprising. Intel’s own data suggests that while it has a significant clock advantage in single-threaded, where its CPUs can burst up to 3GHz+, it’s full-core maximum is well below Qualcomm, at 2.1Ghz versus 2.5GHz. And while the Intel chips have Hyper-Threading, which helps, it’s never been the same as having a full second core. Hyper-Threading would typically be expected to improve performance by 20-30 percent, which leaves Cloudflare’s Qualcomm system with a significant core advantage.

https://www.extremetech.com/computing/259036-early-qualcomm-server-cpu-benchmarks-mean-big-trouble-intel

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.